Computing the integer partition function: Addendum

Neil Calkin, Jimena Davis, Kevin James, Elizabeth Perez, Charles Swannack


Date: May 1, 2006

The algorithm of [25] was used with $ N_p = 108$ to compute $ p(n)$ modulo primes less than $ 104$ for $ n \le 10^9$. Here we list additional statistics to those appearing in [25]. Computations are ongoing. In order to be concise we only list the intermediate results for $ 10^6,10^7,10^8$ and $ 10^9$.

In order to examine the conjectures and speculation of [6] we make the following definitions.

Definition 0.1   Let $ M \in \mathbb{Z}$ define for any $ X \in \mathbb{Z}$

$\displaystyle \mu(M,X) = \frac{1}{M} \sum_{j=0}^{M-1} \delta_j(M,X) = \frac{1}{M}
$

and

$\displaystyle \sigma^2(M,X) = \frac{1}{M} \sum_{j=0}^{M-1} \left( \delta_j(M,X) -
\frac{1}{M} \right)^2
$

to be the mean and variance of the distribution of $ p(n) \pmod{M}$ for $ n < X$ respectively.

Definition 0.2   Let $ M \in \mathbb{Z}$ and define for any $ X \in \mathbb{Z}$

$\displaystyle \mu_d(M,X) = \frac{1}{M-1} \sum_{j=1}^{M-1} \delta_j(M,X)
= \frac{1 - \delta_0(M,X)}{M-1}
$

and

$\displaystyle \sigma^2_d(M,X) = \frac{1}{M-1} \sum_{j=1}^{M-1} \left( \delta_j(M,X) -
\mu_d(M,X) \right)^2
$

to be the mean and variance of the distribution of $ p(n) \pmod{M}$ among the non-zero congruence classes mod $ M$ for $ n < X$.

For each prime $ l \ge 5$, define the two integers $ \epsilon_l$ and $ \delta_l$ to be

$\displaystyle \epsilon_l = \left( \frac{-6}{l} \right)
$

and

$\displaystyle \delta_l = \frac{l^2 - 1}{24}.
$

Further, let $ S_l$ be the set of $ (l+1)/2$ integers

$\displaystyle S_l = \left\{ \beta \in \{0, 1, \ldots, l-1 \} :
\left( \frac{\beta + \delta_l}{l} \right) = 0 \; \textnormal{or} \; -
\epsilon_l \right\}.
$

Then, we have the following theorem from [10]

Theorem 0.1   If $ l \ge 5$ is prime, $ m$ is a positive integer, and $ \beta \in S_l$, then there are infinitely many non-nested arithmetic progressions $ \{ An + B\} \subset \{ ln + \beta \}$ such that

$\displaystyle p( A n + B ) \equiv 0 \pmod{l^m}
$

for every integer $ n$.

This naturally leads the authors of [10] to the following speculation.

Speculation 0.1   If $ l \ge 5$ is prime and $ 0 \le r < l$, define $ \delta'_r(l,X)$ by

$\displaystyle \delta'_r(l,X) = \frac{\char93  \left\{ n < X : p(n) \equiv r \pm...
...\in S_l \right\} }{
\char93 \left\{ n < X : n \pmod{l} \not\in S_l \right\} }
$

is it true that $ \lim_{X \to \infty} \delta'_r(l,X) = \frac{1}{l}$ ?

This leads to the following definition

Definition 0.3   Let $ M \in \mathbb{Z}$ define for any $ X \in \mathbb{Z}$

$\displaystyle \mu_p(M,X) = \frac{1}{M} \sum_{j=0}^{M-1} \delta'_j(M,X) = \frac{1}{M}
$

and

$\displaystyle \sigma_p^2(M,X) = \frac{1}{M} \sum_{j=0}^{M-1} \left( \delta'_j(M,X) -
\mu_p(M,X) \right)^2
$

to be the mean and variance of the distribution of $ p(n) \pmod{M}$ for $ n \not\in S_M$ and $ n < X$ respectively.





Charles Swannack 2006-05-01